-
To
chevron_right
A German Court Drew the Piracy Line at 81.5%, KinoGO Was Blocked with (at least) 82.4%
news.movim.eu / TorrentFreak • 1 day ago • 3 minutes
Since 2021, major German Internet providers have
agreed to block
the country’s most egregious pirate sites through the Clearing Body for Copyright on the Internet, better known as
CUII
.
The system started as an administrative scheme without judicial oversight. CUII’s own committee issued blocking recommendations, and the Federal Network Agency signed off before providers acted.
This setup changed in mid-2025 , when the stakeholders rewrote their code of conduct so that every block now starts with a rightsholder suing one ISP. Once a court confirms the block, the other providers follow.
CUII no longer issues the orders, but it will still communicate the recommendations to all participants. In recent weeks, the clearing body published several new ones based on orders from the Cologne Regional Court, targeting KinoGo and Streamed.
The structural infringement check
The court orders are not available to us, but according to CUII’s paperwork, these targets are classified as structurally copyright infringing websites, making the blocking orders “reasonable and proportionate.”
As is typical in Germany, the requesting rightsholders and the targeted domains are not mentioned. However, based on the brands and data from the independent transparency portal CUIIListe , streamed.pk, streamed.st, and kinogo.ec were all blocked in Germany this month.
CUII’s paperwork does reveal one hard statistic. For each site, a private investigator pulls a random sample of the site’s content, to see how much of it infringes at a 95.5 percent confidence level. This number is used to determine whether the target site is indeed ‘structurally’ infringing.
For example, for Streamed, the investigator put the infringing share somewhere between 96.16 and 100 percent. For KinoGo, meanwhile, between 82.4 and 94.6 percent of the content is pirated.
The 82.4 percent floor is the lowest we have seen so far, below all previous German blocking orders we have seen, including the ones below.
| Site | Ruling | Share infringing |
|---|---|---|
| KinoGO | Jul 2026 | 82.4% to 94.6% |
| LIVETV.SX | Apr 2026 | 85.28% to 96.72% |
| SPORTPLUS | Feb 2026 | 88.8% to 100% |
| MegaKino | Feb 2024 | 89.8% to 100% |
| Kinoger | Nov 2025 | 91.4% to 99.0% |
| Anna’s Archive | Sep 2025 | 91.6% to 94.8% |
| NSWPedia | Jan 2026 | 94.4% to 99.8% |
| s.to | Feb 2021 | 94.84% to 100% |
| LibGen | May 2024 | 96.07% to 98.23% |
| Streamed | Jul 2026 | 96.16% to 100% |
| cine.to | Jun 2022 | 96.28% to 100% |
The 81.5% ‘Line’
In a March 2025 order targeting HDFILME, STREAMCLOUD and FILMPALAST, CUII specifically stated when illegal content clearly outweighs the legal content on a site.
“The illegal content on the websites far outweighs the legal content. This is the case in any event when at least 81.5% of the website’s content is illegal,” the order reads , translated from German.
It is the only CUII order we found that puts a number on it. The figure traces back to the Cologne Regional Court, which set it in a January 2025 default judgment against the download portal NOX, a case the operator never contested. That same judgment triggered NOX’s own block.
In KinoGo’s example, the 82.4 percent floor is getting quite close to the 81.5 percent.
This percentage is not a hard benchmark for the court or for CUII to determine whether a site is blockable. However, one can imagine that it’s not a good look when it drops lower than that, especially when legal content would outweigh their pirated counterparts.
This doesn’t mean that KinoGo is a questionable target. The site has been a thorn in the side of rightsholders for many years. It has more than 50 million monthly visits, mostly from Belarus and Ukraine, which it has historically targeted.
Hiding in Plain Content?
The open question is how much of a site’s library has to be pirated before a block can be issued in Germany, and whether 81.5 percent is considered to be a general benchmark or just a figure tied to that one case.
If there is a fixed percentage, there are some obvious exploits that come to mind. In theory, an operator could pad an archive with public domain films or AI generated filler, pushing the investigator’s interval below the line while the pirated library stays intact.
We asked CUII whether the 81.5 percent can be treated as a fixed benchmark, but it has not responded by the time of publication. We will update this article if they do.
Update: Romsns.com is also blocked. CUII just published the associated recommendation. The Virustotal scan below shows that there are multiple malware warnings for this comain.
—
A copy of the Streamed order can be found here (pdf) and the KinoGo order can be found here (pdf) . An archive of all CUII determinations is also available on the clearinghouse’s official website .
From: TF , for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.