• Pl chevron_right

      Michael Meeks: 2026-07-23 Thursday

      news.movim.eu / PlanetGnome • 23 July 2026

    • Tech. planning call, sync with Caolan, lunch with J. Pleased to be mentioned in the Irish Parliament - go Ireland!
    • Really pleased to see Collabora Online 26.04 released for customer use: the foundation of another year of development and improvement. Thanks to our partners for supporting our press release , and for our customers and partners for funding much of the awesome team that create a slew of fun new features alongside the community.
    • Pl chevron_right

      Felipe Borges: On Planet GNOME and personal opinions

      news.movim.eu / PlanetGnome • 23 July 2026

    Putting on my Planet GNOME editor hat for a quick PSA!

    Planet GNOME is a convenient aggregator for personal blogs by members of our community. While all content must follow our Code of Conduct , the views expressed in these posts are solely those of the individual authors.

    They don’t represent or reflect the opinions of the GNOME Project as an entity or community.

    To help highlight this, we’ve added a “Voices of the community” tagline to the website header. It links directly to our “Add feed” section, which also emphasizes that Planet collects the latest posts from personal blogs.

    Enjoy the personal insights and variety of perspectives!

    • Pl chevron_right

      Michael Calabrese: GUADEC 2026

      news.movim.eu / PlanetGnome • 23 July 2026 • 4 minutes

    When Felipe first emailed us about the GUADEC 2026 travel grant, we were thrilled to learn that we were going to have the opportunity to attend the conference in person.

    This was my first GUADEC, and it was a pleasure to meet the GNOME community and put faces to names. The conference was held in A Coruña, Spain, which turned out to be an amazing city with great food, friendly people, and beautiful views along the coast.

    GUADEC 2026 A Coruña

    Community

    The first thing I would like to mention was how patient and open the community was to both my fiancée Laureen and me. We knew going into the conference that we were much more junior than many of the developers attending, but everyone was incredibly approachable.

    I received a great deal of help debugging issues in my local development environment, as well as guidance on some of the more difficult parts of my GSoC project.

    GUADEC 2026 Dinner A Coruña

    Talks

    The talks were very informative and I took way too many notes to include them all here without turning this into a novel. That said, I wanted to write a short summary of a couple of talks that I found interesting:

    Varlink for System Components

    Sebastian Wick gave a talk about modernizing the system component stack. His proposed idea for allowing more memory safety and zero cost abstractions was to write components in Rust, however this introduces the issue of introspection. For asynchronous functionality, Tokio and Glib both have main loops, and moving data between the loops can introduce a lot of overhead. GObject bindings can also make Rust's memory safety essentially moot.

    Sebastian spoke about potentially not using GObject in some cases, and instead exposing more functionality over IPC using Varlink. Varlink is language agnostic, and services could be consumed from many languages without requiring GObject bindings. This process also would be very simple, allowing signals to occur as JSON strings that are easily observable. This would require some new crates to replace Glib functionality, and some more complicated functionality like file thrashing and sftp could be particularly difficult.

    It is early, the ecosystem is still being built, but Sebastian argued that usage patterns will evolve and getting involved now will help shape the future of GNOME and Rust.

    Using GTK in C++ with Peel

    Sergey Bugaev hosted a workshop on using GTK from C++ with Peel. Peel is a library that allows you to use GTK in C++ to make GTK applications and widgets. Sergey made a simple widget that can draw using stylus input, and he walked us through the process of creating a simple application using Peel. The workshop was very informative.

    I really regret not coding his example myself, I wish a recording of the lecture had been taken. That said, his repo can be found at https://gitlab.gnome.org/bugaevc/peel and his readme has instructions for usage and a basic code example.

    Debugging with Tracy

    Ivan Molodetskikh gave a talk that seemed really handy to me about using Tracy to profile performance for Mutter, GNOME shell, and applications. I had never heard of Tracy before this talk, however the capabilities seemed very handy. Tracy visualizes "zones" on a timeline, allowing you to see exactly where execution time is being spent across threads. The Tracy zones must nest correctly, where parent zones cannot end before their child zones. It can also show where threads are waiting. This allows for a very clear visualization of where time is being spent in the application, and can help identify bottlenecks or bugs.

    The major downside to Tracy is that it requires a lot of setup, and the application must be compiled with the Tracy client library. Ivan gave a fairly in-depth breakdown of how to add Tracy profiling to an application, and I will go back to the recording of his talk to actually implement it in the future.

    Technical Take Aways for My Project

    • Sergey Bugaev helped me get the GIR generation for my C API working correctly. We also improved the FFI by exposing PitiviTimelineRuler directly in the public header rather than accepting a generic GtkWidget* and performing a runtime type check. This makes the API more type-safe and simplifies the Rust implementation. The GIR generation currently works after calling gtk::init() from pitivi_timeline_ruler_get_type() , but Sergey pointed out that this approach will likely fail in CI because the generated scanner shouldn't require GTK to be initialized this way. I'm still trying to build a solid mental model of how GIR generation and introspection work, so if anyone has experience with bindings, I'd love to hear your thoughts.

    • Federico also spent some time reviewing my project with me. He suggested refactoring PitiviTimelineRuler so all of the mutable drawing state lives inside a single RefCell rather than several individual ones, I think the result would look something like this:

    #[derive(Default)]
    struct DrawingState {
        cache: BTreeMap<...>,
        font: Option<...>,
        handler_id: Option<...>,
    }
    
    #[derive(Properties)]
    #[properties(wrapper_type = super::MyWidget)]
    pub struct MyWidget {
    
        #[property(get, set)]
        zoom_level: Cell<u64>,
    
        state: RefCell<DrawingState>,
    }
    

    Thanks to GNOME Foundation

    I want to give a special thanks to the GNOME Foundation for granting us the travel grant to attend GUADEC 2026. It was a wonderful experience and I look forward to attending future conferences in person!

    • Pl chevron_right

      Michael Meeks: 2026-07-22 Wednesday

      news.movim.eu / PlanetGnome • 22 July 2026

    • Up early, sync with Stephan, Pranam, Laser, all-hands call, snatched lunch, Collabora quarterly mgmt meeting.
    • Published the next strip: An interview with Maurice: digging into organizations
    • Pleased to see FLOSS Weekly Episode 879: Collabora published - great to chat with Jonathan.
    • More quarterly management meeting until late. Poked at a potential child setup thread delay in COOL at the same time. J. cleared shed and garage in the evening for final sealing coat.
    • Pl chevron_right

      Sam Thursfield: 22nd July 2026

      news.movim.eu / PlanetGnome • 22 July 2026 • 3 minutes

    I got funding from my employer to attend the GNOME conference, and one of the requirements is that I write a “conference report” mail with a summary of what I got out of it.

    I’m going to share that email here, with a bit of extra context. If you’re reading my blog — you’re either quite involved in GNOME, or maybe you know me personally and don’t have much of a clue why I go on about gnomes all the time. This email was written for an audience which is largely software engineers, many with an interest in open source and many using GNOME to do their work, but relatively few who are actively developing desktop software or participating as volunteers in big open source projects.



    I’m just back from the GNOME project’s annual meetup. This year it was in A Coruña (near my adopted home town Santiago), where the University has a functioning Linux user group ( GPUL ) and 5 members did an amazing job as the local organizing team.

    The conference is open to GNOME users and anyone interested in open computer interfaces, but it tends towards *intra-project* communication since its the one time that everyone in GNOME gets into a single place.

    Given that, the talk I’m going to recommend is part 2 of the GNOME Foundation AGM:
    https://www.youtube.com/live/Q4O7dhreLDU?si=eGxbIIq3TkVtuty1&t=6739

    If you’ve been in the software world more than 5 minutes you’ll know that high quality code doesn’t go on trees, and if you’ve been involved in any kind of community-led initiative you’ll know that volunteers do not just appear out of nowhere either. GNOME provides a nice interface to use your computer, but also an independent legal entity that is funded and managed by its members, with membership open to anyone who participates actively in the project, and a Board of Directors elected democratically from the membership.

    This part of the AGM was mainly presented by Allan Day, he is primarily a UI designer working at Red Hat but has also dedicated a lot of energy to the non-profit Foundation during a series of quite turbulent years, and for the last year was acting as President of the foundation.

    Some highlights from the presentation if you don’t want to watch the whole thing:

    • There are now nearly 1,000 recurring monthly donations from individuals via the “Friends of GNOME” program.
    • This allows running a year-long “Fellowship” initiative which will fund the work of two long-time volunteer contributors .
    • The Foundation has successfully cut expenses in the last 2 years, including reducing the number of paid staff, and balanced its budget in the short term.
    • Many of the people currently running the Foundation are overworked and dealing with burnout.
    • There needs to be an active effort to maintain and increase the number of monthly donors for the project to survive.

    This kind of management work might seem dry, but its really an essential part of any project with more than a handful of members, and I think Allan’s intuitions as a designer meant that the presentation was a lot more informative and accessible to outsiders than your average AGM.

    Of course, GUADEC is also a good place to find a subset of the Freedesktop SDK community. I did a lightning talk about my mission to allow swapping out the shell & utilities in Freedesktop SDK:
    <https://www.youtube.com/live/Q4O7dhreLDU?si=DFHAFHJxnG8j7SLh&t=26403> . And we landed this branch in time for FDSDK 26.08, which is good news for those of us building operating systems with FDSDK and BuildStream.

    There is plenty more to watch in the videos if you’re interested in open source desktop and mobile software… including some talks by Abderrahim and some workshops run by Javier, but I’ll leave them to highlight what happened in those 😉

    Thanks as always to Codethink for sponsoring us to attend.



    • Pl chevron_right

      Peter Hutterer: libei and graphics tablets stylus support

      news.movim.eu / PlanetGnome • 22 July 2026 • 3 minutes

    While you (yes, you! no, not you, the one behind you) have been sweltering in the heatwaves of the northern hemispheres (Assisted-by: AI), I've been busy adding graphics tablet support to libei. This is scheduled for the soon to be released libei 1.7.0.

    The initial work was done by Jason Gerecke and Josh Dickens from Wacom, I've been extending, polishing and testing it for the last few weeks.

    Also, upfront: this only covers the stylus part of a tablet, we do not yet have an implementation for the "pad" part (the buttons, dials, rings, strips).

    libei is, of course, the library for Emulated Input, a good-enough transport layer for sending logical input events between processes. We're already using libei as part of the XDG Portal Remote Desktop and Input Capture portals where we've been busy hurtling key and pointer events between the participating parties (and soon gesture events and text ).

    In the next release of libei, we will now also have "ei stylus" capabilities, i.e. the ability to send tablet stylus events. Getting pointer, keyboard and touch events supported was a long undertaking, everything was new and shiny and needed to be added everywhere in the stack. Now that all this is in place, scuffed and scratched, adding tablet events will be quite simple.

    The ei stylus interface

    Here's a short outline of how libei handles tablet events because it is, of course, different to how libinput handles them. Logical events are much nicer after all than physical hardware events.

    First: we have a new interface: "ei_stylus". An EIS implementation (e.g. your compositor) may provide you, the libei client, with a device that supports this interface and one or more associated regions (typically representing the available screen areas). Typically this will be a separate device to the pointer devices or the keyboard devices but it's not a requirement. The ei_stylus interface comes with a bunch of capabilities you'd expect from a stylus (tilt, pressure, distance, ...) that you can selectively enable to emulate the stylus you want to. So basically, EIS will say "here's a stylus device, I support pressure, tilt, rotation, ..." and then the libei client says "This stylus should have pressure and tilt but nothing else". And then you do the normal thing: send proximity events, send tip down/up events, send data for the various capabilities you've enabled.

    Happily for the EIS implementation, libei forces the client to take the guesswork out of everything: if you select the pressure capability, you must send a pressure value when coming into proximity. Where libei is used to forward data from a physical stylus (e.g. via some remoting protocol) it is up to the client to deal with firmware bugs that e.g. won't send data until a few frames in.

    Note that there is no "tablet" anywhere. The tablet is represented by the region that the device may interact with. So in some ways every tablet is an on-screen tablet (which makes sense since we have logical events).

    Multiple styli

    The only quirky thing is how to request multiple styli[1]: libei 1.5.0 has added a "request device" request that allows a client to say "hey, EIS, I want a new device with capabilities pointer, keyboard, ...". And, if you've been a nice client, minding your own business, the EIS implementation may just create such a device for you.

    So for the case of multiple styli: if the default stylus (if any) isn't good enough, you can now tell EIS that you want a(nother) device with stylus capability, configure the stylus capabilities once the device shows up and voila, you now have a normal pen, an art pen and maybe even an airbrush represented as logical device in libei. And since they're all separate devices in the protocol, they can be individually tracked and used, much like libinput tracks individual styli.

    [1] For the "lots" of users that actually use multiple styli...

    • Pl chevron_right

      Peter Hutterer: libei and gesture events

      news.movim.eu / PlanetGnome • 22 July 2026 • 1 minute

    /me gestures vaguely at everything

    Oh, hey, this works now? Great!

    libei 1.7.0 (to be released soon) comes with a new interface: "ei_gestures" which, creatively, will allow for gestures to be sent between a libei client and an EIS implementation (typically: a Wayland compositor).

    I'm not going to go too deeply into how pinch, swipe and hold gestures work, suffice to say we've had those in libinput (for touchpads) for years now so compositors and toolkits should already support those. And since libei and libinput have vaguely equivalent API layers integrating gestures for libei devices in compositors should be fairly straightforward.

    The plumbing layers in the portals exist already too, so adding gestures to libei means that - once the compositors support it - we can have gestures support in remote desktop and input capture implementations without needing to update anything else. Hooray! Join in with me. Hooray! Louder! HOORAY!

    For testing I had a (vibe-coded and thus immediately abandoned once testing was complete) gesturemouse utility which translates input events from a mouse into gesture events (depending which button is down). But don't let my lack of be a limit to your imagination, I'm sure you can come up with good use-cases for this.

    • Pl chevron_right

      Peter Hutterer: libei and keysym/text events

      news.movim.eu / PlanetGnome • 22 July 2026 • 2 minutes

    If you've been paying attention (and I know you have, because it'd be embarrassing for you if you didn't) you'd have noticed that libei 1.6 (May 2026) added support for keysym and text events.

    libei sends logical events between a libei client and an EIS implementation (typically: a Wayland compositor) but the keyboard interface it had was designed like real keyboards: key codes together with an (XKB) key map. You press one key, the keymap decides what that key means on the compositor side and off we go. This is easy but not always useful.

    As of 1.6.0 libei now also supports an "ei_text" interface. A compositor may choose to provide you[0] with a device that supports this interface and that gives you two really nice opportunities.

    First, you can now send a key sym. Instead of sending the KEY_Q key code and hoping it actually translates to 'q' (and if there's e.g. a frenchman^Wfrenchperson lurking behind the keyboard it may mean 'a'), you can now send 'q' as actual keysym. Or 'Q' instead of sending shift+q and hoping for no french influence in the process. It becomes the EIS implementation's job to handle that keysym - if it's a shortcut it may handle it directly, otherwise it may pass it on via Wayland to an application[1]. This centralises the keysym to keycode handling in the EIS implementation which is a pain for compositor authors (though they likely have that code already for e.g. RDP support) but reduces the variety of differently-wrong implementations in clients and of course makes it so much simpler to write clients.

    Second, a client can send UTF-8 text to the compositor. So instead of emulating shift, keycodes, etc. you can literally send "Hello World" and expect the EIS implementation to pass that one. Again, makes a bunch of utilities a lot simpler to write and I mostly leave it up to your imagination to figure out what to do with that.

    Notably for both cases: libei is about logical events that have a specific meaning that do not need further interpretation. If a client sends 'Q' that means it is supposed to be an uppercase Q. Sending keysym Shift_L and Q makes little sense. And for the utf8 text events: how the text comes to be matters doesn't matter for libei so you may use an IM to make up the text to begin with and send it, once committed, to EIS. It's not for sending partial strings.

    As mentioned in the previous post : the plumbing for this is already in place so both clients and compositors can add support for this new interface without having to bother the rest of the stack (e.g. portals). So, hooray I guess.

    The text/keysym support is relatively recent so expect this to hit the next compositor version (or the one after that).

    [0]: the EIS implementation decides which devices are available and arguing about this is even less useful than arguing with a world cup ref
    [1]: after converting it to a key code with possible keymap changes... but hey, such is life

    • Pl chevron_right

      Peter Hutterer: libei integrations in the XDG RemoteDesktop and InputCapture portals

      news.movim.eu / PlanetGnome • 22 July 2026 • 4 minutes

    Turns out it's been years since I've talked about eggs, so let's change this. libei is, of course, the library for Emulated Input [1].

    This post is mostly a refresher because it's been so long and a short summary of some of the work we've done so far, in preparation for some more posts that come soon.

    libei is a transport layer for logical input events, unlike libinput which is a hardware abstraction layer. In libinput's case the device's firmare/kernel pass events that are somewhere on the sanity spectrum, libinput tries to make sense of those and then we convert those to logical events to be consumed by the next layer (typically the Wayland compositor or Xorg). This is how e.g. "touch down at position x1/y1, touch up at position x1/y2" is converted into a button click event if touchpad tapping is enabled. Or maybe into nothing if we find it was an accidental palm touch.

    libei works purely on the logical level - you as the libei client pass logical events to the EIS (Emulated Input Server) implementation (typically the compositor). No guesswork, you say button click, EIS gets a button click. libei supports a "sender" and "receiver" mode, depending on whether events are sent to the EIS implementation (input emulation) or receive from the EIS implementation (input capture). libei is designed for the Wayland stack but there are zero requirements for Wayland on either the client or the EIS implementation.

    Core to libei's design is that the EIS implementation is in control of virtually everything, it decides which devices are available to the client, when those devices can send events, etc. Much like the compositor is in charge when it comes to physical devices - if a compositor decides a physical device doesn't exist, a Wayland client cannot get events from it.

    Since the original proposal (again, [1]!) we've been busy bees and libei is now a part of the XDG Remote Desktop portal and the XDG Input Capture (both since version 1.17, mid 2023). In both cases the portal is for the negotiation and initial agreement of what should happen, libei is then used as the transport layer between the two processes [2].

    More recently we also added session persistence support so you don't have to allow access on every connecton. Much of the work enabling this was done by Jonas Ådahl, it is now in the portals since version 1.21.0 and should be in the major compositors in the current or next versions.

    Plumbing the Pipes

    Getting all this into place was a huge amount of work across several pieces of the stack. This isn't exciting in the same way as laying plumbing pipes isn't particularly exciting but much like regular plumbing: once it's in place you can change your diet without severely impacting everyone again. Try get that analogy out of your head now. You're welcome.

    In libei's case this means three things:

    • if you have a client that uses the XDG portals to send/receive events they will now work with any compositor that implements the portal. No need for GNOME/KDE/... specific APIs.
    • if you have a compositor that implements EIS you have all the infrastructure in place to talk to libei clients from somewhere else, if need be. The use-cases for this aren't fully scoped yet (assisitive technologies, virtual keyboards, touchpads, etc?) but the piping is there and ready to be (ab)used .
    • since the actual events back and forth don't affect the layers in between, we can now add new events to libei without having to change everything else again.
    Let's look at how this works in practice.

    The XWayland XTEST use-case

    An example for such a case where we can now abuse the piping is Xwayland support for XTEST. XTEST is the protocol that everyone uses to emulate input under X but in Wayland it's not hooked up to anything so those APIs simply won't work.

    But what we can do in Xwayland is translate XTEST to libei events and facilitate the portal interaction. This means our stack looks roughly like this:

        +--------------------+             +------------------+
        | Wayland compositor |---wayland---| Wayland client B |
        +--------------------+\            +------------------+
        | libinput |   EIS   | \_wayland______
        +----------+---------+                \
            |          |           +-------+------------------+
     /dev/input/       +-----------| libei |     XWayland     |
                                   +-------+------------------+
                                                    |
                                                    | XTEST
                                                    |
                                             +-----------+
                                             |  X client |
                                             +-----------+
    
    And if said X client uses XTEST to try to emulate devices, Xwayland will ask the Remote Desktop portal for permission and set up the session, then pass the XTEST events on as libei events and voila - your 20 year old X client can send pointer and keyboard events through an XDG Portal without knowing about it (and the user can prohibit this and even gets some information on who is sending events which is not possible with normal XTEST at all). This has now been supported since Xwayland 23.2.0. Compositors don't need extra support for this.

    What's next

    So we have a lot of the plumbing in place, or in another anology: we have a hammer, let's go looking for nails. And right now the nails we can see are sending text, gestures, and tablet support. And those will be the subject of the next few posts.

    [1]: 6 years ago?! whoah...
    [2]: in Remote Desktop's case replacing the DBus emulation APIs which were a Newton's Cradle of wakeups for at least 4 processes per event